Data & Difficulty
Hardest and Easiest College Majors, by Grade Data and Study Hours
Difficulty depends on how you measure it, and on what your strengths are. Compare registrar GPA data with self-reported study hours from 180,000 college seniors.
How we define "hardest"
"Hardest" is not a single number. We use two independent, real, currently public data sources: grade distributions from university registrars, and weekly study hours by field from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). These don't always agree, since grade data reflects grading norms as much as difficulty, but together they paint a clearer picture than either alone.
How Difficulty Gets Measured
College difficulty is hard to pin down. A major can be objectively challenging (advanced prerequisites, math-heavy coursework) and still award high grades. Conversely, students might earn modest GPAs in a major because of rigorous grading standards, not because the material is harder to learn. Here's how we separate signal from noise:
Source 1: Grade Distributions from University Registrars
Several large public universities publish department-level grade averages: Indiana University, University of Wisconsin–Madison, UCLA, and others. When engineering students average a 2.8 GPA while business students average a 3.4, it suggests that either the curriculum is more rigorous, the grading is stricter, or both. Public registrar data avoids the bias of self-reported difficulty: it's actual grades, not opinions.
What it reveals: Objective grading standards and course rigor.
What it doesn't: How well students learned; whether low GPAs reflect hard work or weak preparation; attrition rates or course difficulty before a student switches majors.
Source 2: Self-Reported Study Hours (NSSE)
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) surveys 180,000+ seniors at 600+ institutions annually, including questions on time spent preparing for class. Engineering seniors report 19 hours per week; business and social science majors average 15–16 hours. This reflects a widely shared perception of workload across many campuses and institutional types.
What it reveals: Perceived workload and course intensity across diverse institutions.
What it doesn't: Absolute difficulty; it's skewed by self-selection (motivated students study more); it includes reading, homework, and projects, not just "hard" work.
Why They Differ
A major can have high average GPAs (A− or A) even if it's genuinely difficult. This happens in:
- Humanities and arts: Subjective grading and rubrics often favor effort and argumentation, not just accuracy. A poorly written philosophy paper might earn a B if the thinking is novel.
- Social sciences and business: Curves and participation points pad GPAs; exams may be graded more leniently than STEM equivalents.
- Most departments at selective schools: Grade inflation is widespread. Average GPAs nationwide rose from 2.93 (1983) to 3.30 (2010) without students studying more.
Majors with the Lowest Average GPAs
The following data is drawn from public university registrar reports. These are actual, unfiltered GPAs across all students in these majors, not filtered by admission stats or prior coursework.
| Field of Study | Average GPA | Data Source |
|---|---|---|
| Aerospace Engineering | 2.83 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Chemical Engineering | 2.85 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Physics | 2.87 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Electrical Engineering | 2.88 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Chemistry | 2.90 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Mechanical Engineering | 2.92 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Computer Science | 3.02 | Multi-institution analysis |
| Biology | 3.07 | Multi-institution analysis |
Note: These figures are aggregated from multiple public university sources. Individual institutions vary significantly; some engineering programs average 3.0+, while others drop below 2.8. Consult your prospective college's registrar for exact data.
Majors Students Report Spending the Most Hours On
Based on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), seniors in these fields report the highest weekly study hours, including class, reading, homework, lab work, and projects:
| Field of Study | Study Hours/Week | Survey Year |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19.0 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Biology, Agriculture, Natural Resources | 18.4 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Physical Sciences, Math, Computer Science | 18.2 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Arts and Humanities | 17.6 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Health Professions | 17.0 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Social Sciences | 16.3 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Education | 15.8 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Business | 15.7 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Communications, Media, Public Relations | 15.1 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
| Social Services | 14.4 | NSSE 2014–2023 |
All U.S. college seniors averaged 15 hours per week in the same period. Context: A typical full-time course load is 12–15 credit hours per week (4 classes), so these numbers reflect 2–5 additional hours of studying outside class per course.
Majors with the Highest Average GPAs
Fields where students report higher GPAs, either because the material is more accessible, grading is more generous, or both:
| Field of Study | Average GPA (Approx.) | Typical Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Education | 3.50+ | High grading norms; rubric-based evaluation |
| Communication & Journalism | 3.45+ | Subjective grading; participation-heavy |
| Social Work | 3.40+ | Practicum-based; holistic evaluation |
| Business Administration | 3.35+ | Curved exams; group project points |
| Psychology | 3.30+ | Essay-heavy; rubric-based grading |
| English & Literature | 3.28+ | Subjective grading; effort rewarded |
The gap between easiest (3.50+) and hardest (2.83) is significant. Students in aerospace engineering average 0.67 points lower than education majors. Yet both groups report working hard. The difference often lies in grading philosophy: STEM courses typically use curved exams and objective rubrics; humanities use holistic, effort-inclusive rubrics.
Why Hardest Depends on What You're Good At
"Hardest major" is a trick question because difficulty is not universal. The data above describe aggregate patterns, but individual students experience majors very differently.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Demands
Engineering, physics, and chemistry place a premium on objective problem-solving: set up the equation, solve it, check the answer. Mistakes are obvious and costly. Students with strong spatial reasoning and algebra skills may find these majors flow naturally; those who think more verbally or conceptually may struggle despite strong overall intelligence.
Conversely, humanities majors emphasize argumentation, synthesis, and interpretation. A student who excels at ambiguity, textual analysis, and rhetoric might ace philosophy or literature while finding calculus overwhelming.
Workload vs. Interest
Study hours vary partly by volume (engineering labs are time-sinks) and partly by engagement. A music major composing original work might spend 20 hours per week and experience it as play; an unmotivated business student spending 15 hours on mandatory group projects might find it grueling.
Grading Norms as Gatekeeping
Low GPAs in engineering aren't random. Departments use grading as a filter: the hardest courses (organic chemistry, thermodynamics, signals & systems) have intentionally low grade distributions. This serves two functions: it signals rigor to employers and graduate programs, and it screens out students who may struggle with advanced coursework later.
A 2.8 GPA in engineering often signals competence; a 2.8 in business signals struggle. Employers and graduate programs know this and adjust their expectations accordingly.
Attrition and Self-Selection
Some majors appear "harder" because weaker students leave. About 40–50% of students who enter engineering switch to other majors within two years. Those who remain are self-selected for persistence with quantitative reasoning. The majors that report lower study hours may attract students who can complete the work efficiently, or who do less extra studying because the coursework is more straightforward.
FAQ
Is engineering really the hardest major?
By two major metrics, average GPA (2.8–2.9) and reported study hours (19/week), yes, engineering and related STEM fields consistently rank at the top for difficulty. But "hardest" is context-dependent. Engineering is hardest if you're weak at algebra and spatial reasoning; it's moderately challenging if you excel at those skills. An English major might find engineering unbearable while an engineer finds writing a 20-page thesis impossible.
Do easy majors hurt my job prospects or grad school applications?
Not directly, but they matter less on your resume. A 4.0 in education doesn't impress graduate engineering programs; a 3.5 in physics does. Employers and graduate programs calibrate expectations by major: a 3.2 engineering GPA is viewed as equivalent to a 3.7 business GPA, roughly. What matters most is what you did with the degree: internships, projects, research, skills. A high GPA in an easy major paired with no work experience loses to a moderate GPA in a hard major with strong projects.
Does a hard major help or hurt my GPA for grad school?
It depends on the graduate program. PhD programs in STEM expect low GPAs from undergrads in STEM majors and factor that in. A 3.0 in physics is competitive for many PhD programs; a 3.0 in business is not competitive for MBA programs. Law school admission is GPA-sensitive regardless of major, so a low GPA in any field is a disadvantage. If you're considering grad school, check the average admitted GPA for your target program and major. That's more informative than abstract statements about major difficulty.
Why do engineering and chemistry have such low GPAs?
Three reasons: (1) content difficulty: calculus, quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics have steep learning curves; (2) grading harshness: engineering departments often use curved exams and objective rubrics that reward accuracy, not effort; (3) course design: many STEM courses are intentionally structured to weed out students. This gatekeeping is partly about rigor and partly about managing enrollment in resource-intensive labs. The low GPAs reflect the grading standard, not purely the student population's ability.
Does high study time mean a major is harder, or just more work?
Both, but they're different. A major can require 20 hours per week of work and still award high GPAs (example: music composition, which is time-intensive but subjectively graded). Conversely, a 3-hour physics course might demand 9 hours per week of independent study and still yield low grades due to curved exams. Study time correlates with difficulty but doesn't measure it perfectly. Use both GPA and study-hour data together: low GPA + high study time suggests genuine rigor; high GPA + high study time suggests heavy but manageable coursework.
How do I know if a major is right for me if I hate math?
Math is unavoidable in engineering, chemistry, physics, and most computer science programs. If you hate math now, these majors will be a daily source of frustration. However, many high-difficulty majors exist outside STEM: pre-med (if you focus on biology), economics (data-heavy but less abstract than pure math), architecture (visual-spatial but requires some calculus), and nursing (dense content but less theoretical math). The "hardest" majors for you are the ones misaligned with your strengths, not the ones with the lowest GPA average. Honest self-assessment beats prestige-chasing.
Sources
- National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), Time Spent on Selected Activities by Related-Major Category
- Indiana University, Study time varies by college students' major, corresponds to faculty expectations, survey finds
- Indiana University Bloomington, IUB Grade Distribution Database
- University of Wisconsin–Madison, Grades and GPA Reports
- University of Delaware, Institutional Research – Grade Distributions
- University of Illinois Chicago, Office of Institutional Research – Grade Distribution Data
- WhatIsAGoodGPA.com, Average College GPA by Major: 2026 Data for 27 Fields of Study
- Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. H. (2012). Where A is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940–2009. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1–23.